Consortium Gap Analysis for EU Grants
Build stronger Horizon Europe consortia. Analyse your partners against 56,000+ organisations from funded EU projects. Check track records, identify coverage gaps, and discover proven institutions for your topic.
WHY IT MATTERS
A weak consortium kills strong proposals
Horizon Europe evaluators score consortium quality as a separate criterion. Even proposals with excellent science and clear innovation get rejected when the consortium lacks geographic balance, missing expertise, or unproven partners.
The challenge is knowing what a “strong” consortium looks like for your specific topic. What country mix works? Which organisations have won similar calls? Do your partners have the track record evaluators expect?
CriteriaI answers these questions by analysing your consortium against the actual winning consortia for similar funded projects.
WHAT WE ANALYSE
Four dimensions of consortium strength
Partner track records
We match your named partners against the full CORDIS organisation database. For each partner, you see: number of EU projects, funding schemes won, coordinator experience, and performance on calls similar to yours. Evaluators check this — now you can too.
Country coverage
Geographic balance matters. We check whether your consortium includes the right mix of countries — especially widening countries (EU-13 and associated countries) which many calls explicitly require or reward. Missing a widening country partner can cost you points.
Capability gaps
By analysing the consortia of similar funded projects, we identify expertise areas and organisation types that are common in winning proposals but missing from yours. These gaps are what evaluators will flag — better to find them now.
Partner suggestions
We suggest real institutions from similar winning consortia — filtered by activity type (university, research centre, SME, public body), country, and topic relevance. Every suggestion comes with the organisation's EU project history so you can assess fit before reaching out.
DEEP EVALUATION
Deep consortium analysis goes further
The standard evaluation provides consortium scoring, partner track records, and basic gap analysis. Deep evaluation adds a dedicated consortium specialist agent that produces:
- Reference consortia from the 5 most similar funded projects — showing the exact country mix, partner types, and budget distributions that won
- Organisation-level track record analysis for every named partner, including their success rate and the specific calls they've won
- Budget allocation guidance based on how similar winning proposals distributed funding across partners
- A mock reviewer critique that flags exactly what an evaluator would say about your consortium composition
FAQ
Consortium analysis questions
The next Horizon Europe deadline
is closer than you think.
Start with 3 free evaluations. No credit card. No setup. Just paste your objectives.
Evaluate your proposal freeKnow your proposal's competitive position before you submit.