Blog
Practical guides and data-driven insights for writing competitive EU grant proposals.
EU grant proposals fail for predictable reasons — weak novelty framing, wrong funding scheme, untested consortia. CriteriaI benchmarks your proposal against 54,884 funded projects before you submit.
The European Commission has proposed EUR 175 billion for the next framework programme (2028–2034). Here is what has been announced and what it means for researchers and innovators.
A step-by-step guide to structuring your Horizon Europe proposal around the three evaluation criteria — Excellence, Impact, and Implementation — to maximise your chances of funding.
How EU grant proposals are evaluated — from submission to funding decision. Learn about the scoring system, threshold requirements, evaluation panels, and what happens after you submit.
A practical comparison of Horizon Europe funding instruments — Research and Innovation Actions, Innovation Actions, Coordination and Support Actions, and EIC programmes. Know which one fits your project.
The consortium can make or break your Horizon Europe proposal. Learn the requirements, what evaluators look for in partner composition, and strategies for finding the right partners.
Why technically strong proposals still get rejected. A breakdown of the most frequent mistakes in Horizon Europe proposals, mapped to the three evaluation criteria.
A clear breakdown of the Horizon Europe programme structure — three pillars, six thematic clusters, five missions, and where your research fits in.
Novelty is central to the Excellence criterion. Learn how to articulate what is genuinely new about your approach, position it against the state of the art, and avoid the most common mistakes.